• wiccan2@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    2 years ago

    Have we really hit the point where we have to explain versioning to people now.

    • Fubarberry@sopuli.xyzOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 years ago

      Lemmy is a more technical crowd, but many deck owners don’t understand what proton is, or why they might need different versions.

      Most software you don’t even have an option to easily use older versions, so choosing to downgrade proton for a specific game may be a unique experience for some.

      • wiccan2@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        The article has one sentence on using older versions for better compatability with some games.

        The rest of the article is basically summed up by “bigger number means newer”

        The whole article seemed very surface level and didn’t really give any more info than could be derived from the names of the versions. As for the community forks mentioned people could find much better info just looking at the readme.

        Maybe I’m just too technical but it just feels to me as pointless as an article explaining the difference between hot and cold taps on a sink.

        Edit: fix autocorrect

  • Coriza@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    Yet, not the article nor proton GitHub readme explain which version proton-hotfix is based of. I suppose based on proton-experimental, but then again it also makes sense to be based on proton-stable.